This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
""Hobson-Jobson" is also used as a term for the modification of names and phrases in one language into the familiar sounds of another, a phenomenon of which "Hobson-Jobson" is itself an example."
This isn't quite true. A far as I know, Hobson-Jobson refers specifically to the words derived mainly from Hindi and used by the Anglo-Indians during the Indian colonial period. It does not refer to similar linguistical borrowings in general. I have changed the article, but if anyone disagrees with me, feel free to revert it.--Conwiktion 04:54, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
The only sourrce I have is the book "The Meaning of Everything", about the making of Oxford English Dictionary, which mentions in a footnote that the term "Hobson-Jobson" is used in such a way. I've never heard the term used this way myself, but I included the sentence because of that footnote. Quadell(talk) 13:55, Aug 21, 2004 (UTC)
Oops, I forgot to add- I have a copy of Hobson-Jobson myself. It is extremely interesting for anyone familiar with Indian culture and history. So many mainstream English words, Indian English words, and Indian names/titles have such surprisingly interesting histories behind them.--Conwiktion 06:04, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
My understanding is that it refers to the corruption of words/phrases from other languages into a form that fits the target language better, regardless of the source language. The book from which I heard of the term gives a few examples from French, including crayfish from écrevisse and Shotover from château vert. -- Smjg15:15, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please change this article to be factual, as I was mistaken. Apparently, the term Hobson-Jobson is used in a more general sense than merely the creation of new English words using the sound patterns from words in the languages of the former British colonies.--Conwiktion21:44, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
i have not gone back to look it up - but i seem to remember reading that "hobson-jobson" was an example of itself in H.L. Menkin, the English Languge, amd the original definition given above may also be found there. [grebnes, 10/9/06]
IGTI "hobson-jobson" comes from Arabic, not from an Indian language. But the corruption from "Ya Hasan! Ya Hosain!" is clearly an example of changing a word/phrase into a more English-sounding form, which is the basic essence of the phenomenon. Thus the term "hobson-jobson" is self-describing purely on this basis. -- Smjg18:17, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Although Hobson-Jobson may derive "forlorn" from Arabic, it's actually Old English, past participle of 'forlose', according to the OED. Should there be a note to avoid giving the wrong impression? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.148.38.26 (talk) 15:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]